Digital Elevation Model (DEM), Digital Terrain Model (DTM), and Digital Surface Model (DSM): Definitions, Differences, and Uses
Understanding the Earth's surface is essential in a wide variety of fields, from urban planning and environmental monitoring to civil engineering and forestry. To achieve this, different types of elevation models are used to represent the surface of the Earth. Each model serves different purposes, depending on the level of detail required and whether surface objects like trees and buildings need to be included.
This article explores the definitions, advantages, and limitations of each model, helping you understand when and why to use each one for various applications. Selecting the appropriate elevation model is crucial to ensure accurate results.
- Definitions
Digital Elevation Model (DEM):
A DEM represents the Earth's bare surface, capturing the elevation of the terrain without any objects such as buildings or vegetation. It is essentially a 3D representation of the ground elevation.

Digital Terrain Model (DTM):
A DTM is a more refined version of a DEM that includes additional topographical information like contour lines, breaklines, or landforms. It usually represents the natural ground surface, and sometimes also accounts for significant terrain features like ridges, valleys, or streams. For practical purpose “Bare Earth” is generally synonymous with a DTM.
Digital Surface Model (DSM):
A DSM includes both the terrain and the objects on it, such as buildings, trees, and other structures. It represents the highest points on the surface of the Earth at any given location, capturing both natural and man-made features.

- Differences and Characteristics
DEM vs. DTM:
Both represent the Earth’s surface, but DEM is generally a raw elevation model, while a DTM is more detailed, focusing on terrain features. DTM adds precision to the terrain shape and may consider hydrological aspects or terrain breaklines, which are missing in a DEM.
DEM vs. DSM:
A DEM excludes features like buildings and trees, while a DSM captures them, making the DSM a better choice for applications that involve understanding the entire surface, including what is on the land. A DEM, on the other hand, is ideal for bare-earth studies.
DTM vs. DSM:
A DTM focuses on accurately modeling the bare-earth surface and terrain features, whereas a DSM includes buildings, trees, and other surface objects. DTMs are used more for applications requiring precise terrain data, while DSMs are useful in urban planning or forest canopy analysis.
- Advantages and Drawbacks
- DEM:
- Advantages:
- Simple and easy to use for general elevation analysis.
- Less data-heavy since it focuses only on the ground surface.
- Ideal for hydrological modeling and slope analysis.
- Drawbacks:
- Does not account for surface features, making it less useful in urban or heavily forested areas.
- Advantages:
- DTM:
- Advantages:
- More precise terrain representation, including significant topographical features.
- Suitable for engineering and infrastructure projects that require accuracy in terrain form.
- Drawbacks:
- More complex and data-intensive than a DEM.
- Time-consuming to generate due to the need for accurate terrain features.
- Advantages:
- DSM:
- Advantages:
- Captures the true surface, including vegetation and buildings, making it ideal for urban planning, solar radiation studies, and canopy height analysis.
- Useful in visibility analysis and flight path planning for drones or aircraft.
- Drawbacks:
- Often data-heavy due to the inclusion of surface features.
- Not ideal for bare-earth analysis or hydrological modeling since it includes features like trees and buildings.
- Advantages:
- When to use DEM, DTM, or DSM
- DEM Applications:
Hydrological modeling:
Since DEMs focus on the bare earth, they are great for modeling water flow, drainage, or river catchment areas.
Slope and aspect analysis:
DEMs are used to understand terrain slope for agriculture, land use planning, or erosion risk.
Terrain visualization:
Simple terrain representation for 3D models or GIS analysis.
- DTM Applications:
Engineering and construction projects:
DTM is ideal for precise terrain analysis when building roads, railways, or infrastructure in rugged terrains.
Flood risk modeling:
With accurate terrain features, DTMs can improve the precision of flood prediction models.
Archaeological site mapping:
For projects that require the removal of modern features, DTM’s accurate ground surface information is useful.
- DSM Applications:
Urban planning and infrastructure:
DSMs are widely used in city modeling, solar energy assessments (shadows from buildings), and noise pollution studies.
Forestry and canopy height analysis:
DSMs are useful for forest monitoring, helping to estimate canopy height, biomass, or deforestation.
Telecommunications planning:
DSMs help in determining line-of-sight for placing communication towers or satellite dishes.
Tips for choosing the right model
- Use DEM if your focus is on natural terrain analysis, hydrology, or agriculture. It’s the most straightforward elevation model, and it’s quick to process.
- Use DTM if you need a more accurate understanding of the terrain, especially for construction, infrastructure planning, or any analysis requiring high-precision ground surface features.
- Use DSM if your analysis involves man-made or natural surface features like buildings, trees, or other structures. It’s essential for urban modeling, solar studies, and any scenario where surface features impact the result.
By selecting the right elevation model based on your application, you can ensure accurate analysis and results. For precise terrain information, use DTMs. For general ground elevation, stick with DEMs. For complex surfaces with objects and features, DSMs are the best option.
We hope that this article has been helpful! If you have any feedback or questions, please feel free to send us an email or connect with us for a chat. The NTGISC team is here to assist you further!